|
|
|
|
BY SPACEFLIGHT NOW Follow the second test flight of the second SpaceX Falcon 1 rocket. Reload this page for the latest on the mission.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 28, 2007
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2007
0545 GMT (1:45 a.m. EDT) Read our full story.
0410 GMT (12:10 a.m. EDT) Question: What is the significance of today's launch? "I think it's really a big step forward for SpaceX. It gives me great confidence in our upcoming launches. Another thing to bear in mind, Falcon 1 is intended as a scale model, a test vehicle of our larger rockets. As we iron things out on Falcon 1, we're really going to put that knowledge to work on Falcon 9." Question: What is realistic aspiration for SpaceX some 10 years from now? "I feel very confident 10 years from now that we can be putting both satellites and people into orbit, and maybe beyond (Earth) orbit. I feel very confident in the future of commercial spaceflight, private spaceflight and I think this bodes very, very well actually for achieving some of the goals that I mentioned. It is really an excellent indicator that a small company can achieve great things....We had what I would call a relatively minor issue with the roll-control very late in the flight. But all the really big risk items, the ones we were most concerned, have been addressed. If you look at the early history of rocketry, I think they had something like 12 Atlas failures before the 13th one was successful. To get this far on our second launch being an all-new rocket -- new main engine, new first stage, new second stage engine, new second stage, new fairing, new launch pad system, with so many new things -- to have gotten this far is great."
0345 GMT (11:45 p.m. EDT Tues.) Question: Was the loss of telemetry associated with the roll-control problem? "It is very speculative at this point. It is hard for me to say. I think that is a possible cause." Question: What was the debris seen floating away from the second stage engine? "What you might have seen was basically titanium half-hoops that are used to stabilize the nozzle on ascent. However, once you get to a certain temperature the bonding agent for those titanium rings comes off and the titanium rings float away, which occurred as expected." Question: Do you expect to fly another test flight before starting operational launches? "We feel that there is really no need for an extra test flight...We really retired all of the major risk events, the ones we were most concerned about. So I really doubt there is any need for a third test flight. The next flight will be the TacSat mission, which is a Naval Research Lab satellite funded by the Office of Secretary of Defense. I don't anticipate another test launch before that mission." Question: Have you received assurances from both customers for this year -- TacSat and the Malaysian RazakSat spacecraft? "I believe so. Certainly from RazakSat, and the TacSat folks have been on record before as saying no matter what happened to our second launch they were with us. So I assume that remains the same." Question: What caused the roll oscillations? "I can speculate there are a few possible causes. It is could be a helium leak or it could be...we have a cold gas roll-control system, it could be that there was a problem with one of the roll-control jets. But it is difficult to say anything definitive until we have a close look at the telemetry...The only thing we can say definitely at this point is that there was a roll anomaly on the second stage that resulted in us not achieving the intended orbit and, like I said, not likely a full orbit. However, that is fairly easy thing to address. Certainly if it is a leak issue we'll go over and make sure that any potential leaks are addressed in spades. If it's roll-control, one of the cold gas thrusters, I think that would be a very easy thing to address as well. Of the possible causes, I think there's very few that would really take much effort to address." Question: Will the telemetry tell you enough to give you confidence for next launch with real payload? "I think so. It is hard to predict right now but I find it difficult to imagine a circumstance where it wouldn't, where we wouldn't know enough. What we will do at this point is if the telemetry is ambiguous as to the source of the issue, we'll identify all of the possible sources and address all possible sources." Question: Do you know the apogee of the orbit? "Well the maximum altitude was approximately 300 km." Question: Was the second stage intact when it re-entered? "I don't know quite yet. The stage was certainly intact at the loss of telemetry." Question: Could the stage have fallen in a populated area? "No. One of the advantages of being at (Kwajalein) is it's ocean for thousands and thousands of miles." Question: Why would rolling cause premature engine shutdown? "If you have a significant roll, what could happen is that the propellants can centrifuge out."
0315 GMT (11:15 p.m. EDT Tues.) Question: What is the fate of the second stage? "We didn't achieve the desired orbit. But at this point I don't exactly know the fate of the second stage. We got to 300 km. That's about all I know at this point." "All that I can say for sure right now is it's not in the intended orbit. The likelihood is that it re-entered after probably half an orbit or so." "The roll-control anomaly did cause the second stage to shut off prematurely. So that's not achieving the intended orbit. However, I would say we've retired probably in excess of 90 percent of risk associated with the rocket. And it is worth noting, this was a test launch not a satellite launch." Question: How disappointed are you? "This was a pretty nerve-wracking day, to say the least...The rocket business is definitely not a low-stress business, that's for sure. I don't think I'm disappointed actually. I'm actually pretty happy, so I'm sorry if I'm not conveying that...It definitely could have gone a little better today, but if we've retired almost all the risk associated with the rocket, I think it is hard to characterize that (as) anything but a success, at least in my book, because this is a test launch of the rocket and not a satellite launch. I think if it had been a satellite launch, you know, one could perhaps argue differently. But in terms of it being a test launch, the question being have we...learned essentially everything we need know to deliver a satellite successfully to orbit, I think the answer is absolutely. We've learned everything we need to know to deliver a satellite successfully to orbit."
0245 GMT (10:45 p.m. EDT Tues.) "I think I'll characterize this as a very good day for SpaceX. We successfully reached space and really retired almost all the risk associated with the rocket. So I feel very good about where things are. "I feel extremely good about having successful satellite launches later this year, especially when I know we've got two satellite launches lined up for later this year -- one is a Defense Department satellite and the other a Malaysian space agency satellite. We've been in touch with our customers. They are very excited by the results of this test, and so we feel really good actually. "The things we were most concerned about were the first stage ignition and liftoff, the trajectory, the first stage because that goes through the most difficult portion of the atmosphere where you can have high winds and potentially go unstable or potentially have a structural problem and that went flawlessly. We had zero anomalies whatsoever on the first stage. "Stage separation also went very well. Separation events are the No. 2 killer of rockets after engine issues. Both the stage separation and fairing separation went flawlessly. Second stage ignition also was perfect, and we achieved steady state burn on the second stage. "We did encounter, late in the second stage burn, a roll-control anomaly, which you may have seen on the video webcast. We feel that is something that's pretty straightforward to address. So all in all we feel pretty good about this launch. "This was a test launch, which I think most people are aware. So, yes, I think it was a pretty good test."
0220 GMT (10:20 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0218 GMT (10:18 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0214 GMT (10:14 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0204 GMT (10:04 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0156 GMT (9:56 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0154 GMT (9:54 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0145 GMT (9:45 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0140 GMT (9:40 p.m. EDT Tues.) The second stage ignited and the rocket's nose cone jettisoned as the ascent continued. About two minutes into the second stage firing, a SpaceX spokeswoman said the stream of telemetry data from the rocket had been lost and the company's webcast showing video from cameras mounted on the rocket was turned off. The fate of the rocket is not known. The second stage was supposed to fire until almost T+plus 10 minutes to reach the planned orbit featuring a high point of 425 miles, a low point of 205 miles and inclination of 9 degrees north and south of the equator.
0124 GMT (9:24 p.m. EDT Tues.) However, what happened during the second stage burn is not clear. "Regardless, we're thrilled here."
0119 GMT (9:19 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0116 GMT (9:16 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0115 GMT (9:15 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0114 GMT (9:14 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0114 GMT (9:14 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0113 GMT (9:13 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0113 GMT (9:13 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0112 GMT (9:12 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0112 GMT (9:12 p.m. EDT Tues.) And stage separation is confirmed. The separation system with a pneumatic pusher jettisoned the parachute-equipped first stage to fall into the Pacific for retrieval. An awaiting vessel will recover the stage to permit SpaceX the opportunity to thoroughly examine the hardware and potentially reuse it in the future.
0112 GMT (9:12 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0112 GMT (9:12 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0112 GMT (9:12 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0111 GMT (9:11 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0111 GMT (9:11 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0111 GMT (9:11 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0110 GMT (9:10 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0110 GMT (9:10 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0110 GMT (9:10 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0110 GMT (9:10 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0109 GMT (9:09 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0109 GMT (9:09 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0109 GMT (9:09 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0108 GMT (9:08 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0108 GMT (9:08 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0108 GMT (9:08 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0108 GMT (9:08 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0107 GMT (9:07 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0106 GMT (9:06 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0106 GMT (9:06 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0105 GMT (9:05 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0104 GMT (9:04 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0103 GMT (9:03 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0102 GMT (9:02 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0101 GMT (9:01 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0100 GMT (9:00 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0058 GMT (8:58 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0056 GMT (8:56 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0054 GMT (8:54 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0053 GMT (8:53 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0046 GMT (8:46 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0043 GMT (8:43 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0040 GMT (8:40 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0039 GMT (8:39 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0037 GMT (8:37 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0035 GMT (8:35 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0033 GMT (8:33 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0030 GMT (8:30 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0025 GMT (8:25 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0022 GMT (8:22 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0021 GMT (8:21 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0019 GMT (8:19 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0018 GMT (8:18 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0017 GMT (8:17 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0015 GMT (8:15 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0012 GMT (8:12 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0011 GMT (8:11 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0010 GMT (8:10 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0006 GMT (8:06 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0005 GMT (8:05 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0005 GMT (8:05 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0004 GMT (8:04 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0004 GMT (8:04 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0003 GMT (8:03 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0003 GMT (8:03 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0003 GMT (8:03 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0002 GMT (8:02 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0001 GMT (8:01 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0001 GMT (8:01 p.m. EDT Tues.)
0000 GMT (8:00 p.m. EDT Tues.)
TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2007
2358 GMT (7:58 p.m. EDT)
2358 GMT (7:58 p.m. EDT)
2356 GMT (7:56 p.m. EDT)
2355 GMT (7:55 p.m. EDT)
2353 GMT (7:53 p.m. EDT)
2350 GMT (7:50 p.m. EDT)
2348 GMT (7:48 p.m. EDT)
2345 GMT (7:45 p.m. EDT)
2343 GMT (7:43 p.m. EDT)
2339 GMT (7:39 p.m. EDT)
2338 GMT (7:38 p.m. EDT)
2337 GMT (7:37 p.m. EDT)
2335 GMT (7:35 p.m. EDT)
2334 GMT (7:34 p.m. EDT)
2333 GMT (7:33 p.m. EDT)
2330 GMT (7:30 p.m. EDT)
2328 GMT (7:28 p.m. EDT)
2325 GMT (7:25 p.m. EDT)
2320 GMT (7:20 p.m. EDT)
2315 GMT (7:15 p.m. EDT)
2309 GMT (7:09 p.m. EDT)
2305 GMT (7:05 p.m. EDT)
2230 GMT (6:30 p.m. EDT)
2220 GMT (6:20 p.m. EDT) Weather conditions are acceptable at the launch site today, she added.
2218 GMT (6:18 p.m. EDT)
2215 GMT (6:15 p.m. EDT)
2210 GMT (6:10 p.m. EDT)
2205 GMT (6:05 p.m. EDT)
1601 GMT (12:01 p.m. EDT) "The abort that occurred a few minutes before T-0 was triggered by our ground control software. It commanded a switchover of range telemetry from landline to radio, which took place correctly, however, because of the hardware involved, this transition takes a few hundred milliseconds. Before it had time to complete, our system verification software examined state and aborted," SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk said today. "Our simulations done beforehand all passed, because the simulator did not account for a hardware driven delay in the transition. We considered putting the vehicle into a safe state yesterday and updating the ground control software to make the very minor fix needed, but the safer course of action was to stand down. "Yesterday afternoon and evening (Kwaj time), our launch team updated the software to address the timing issue and verified that there were no similar problems elsewhere. We ran the software through several simulated countdowns and then once again with the rocket and range in the loop." Musk said all systems are now go for launch later today.
0014 GMT (8:14 p.m. EDT Mon.)
0011 GMT (8:11 p.m. EDT Mon.)
0010 GMT (8:10 p.m. EDT Mon.)
0003 GMT (8:03 p.m. EDT Mon.) "At about a minute-and-a-half out of launch, we shift from communicating to the vehicle through the land lines to communicating through the Range RF (radio frequency). And it is possible we were just not picking up the Range RF signal. So that's what I know so far," says Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX vice president of business development.
2355 GMT (7:55 p.m. EDT)
2350 GMT (7:50 p.m. EDT)
2346 GMT (7:46 p.m. EDT)
2344 GMT (7:44 p.m. EDT)
2343 GMT (7:43 p.m. EDT)
2343 GMT (7:43 p.m. EDT)
2343 GMT (7:43 p.m. EDT)
2342 GMT (7:42 p.m. EDT)
2341 GMT (7:41 p.m. EDT)
2340 GMT (7:40 p.m. EDT)
2339 GMT (7:39 p.m. EDT)
2338 GMT (7:38 p.m. EDT)
2338 GMT (7:38 p.m. EDT)
2337 GMT (7:37 p.m. EDT)
2336 GMT (7:36 p.m. EDT)
2335 GMT (7:35 p.m. EDT)
2333 GMT (7:33 p.m. EDT)
2331 GMT (7:31 p.m. EDT)
2328 GMT (7:28 p.m. EDT)
2325 GMT (7:25 p.m. EDT)
2324 GMT (7:24 p.m. EDT)
2323 GMT (7:23 p.m. EDT)
2315 GMT (7:15 p.m. EDT)
2257 GMT (6:57 p.m. EDT) With the data stream now working, engineers are processing ahead with the countdown.
2252 GMT (6:52 p.m. EDT) How far behind the countdown is running or the target launch time isn't clear at the moment.
2229 GMT (6:29 p.m. EDT)
2219 GMT (6:19 p.m. EDT)
2200 GMT (6:00 p.m. EDT)
1800 GMT (2:00 p.m. EDT)
SUNDAY, MARCH 18, 2007
SATURDAY, MARCH 17, 2007 Developed by Space Exploration Technologies Corp., the two-stage Falcon 1 rocket currently stands ready for launch on a remote seven-acre island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. The SpaceX launch team cleared one of the final hurdles before launch Thursday, when controllers loaded the booster's first stage with propellant and ignited the Merlin main engine for a static test firing lasting about four seconds. "We had a very successful static fire yesterday that proceeded smoothly with no aborts," SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk said Friday in an update posted on the company's Web site. The launch team uncovered a small glitch in the rocket's GPS guidance system shortly after the test, but the anomaly is not considered major since the Falcon 1 primarily relies on inertial navigation during its flight, Musk said. Another update from SpaceX is expected Sunday, when the company is planning to announce the official planned launch date. The Falcon 1 rocket will fly due east from its secluded launch pad on Omelek Island, part of the U.S. military's missile test range at Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. This week's launch will be a demonstration mission for the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Two NASA-sponsored experiment packages are bolted atop the booster's second stage. Less than 10 minutes after launch, the Falcon 1's second stage Kestrel engine should be commanded to cut off. SpaceX is targeting an orbit about 425 miles high with an inclination of about 9 degrees. SpaceX officials spent the past year wrangling with upgrades to the Falcon 1 launch system after the first attempted flight of the new rocket ended in failure last March due to a rapid fuel leak in its first stage. A government investigation traced the cause of the leak to a corroded aluminum nut in the first stage's Merlin engine, which burns highly refined kerosene called RP-1 and liquid oxygen. The leaking fuel trickled down the outside of the Merlin's thrust chamber and caused a fire after the engine ignited. The Merlin prematurely shut down about 30 seconds after liftoff, and the 70-foot-tall rocket fell from the sky and plummeted into the ocean just offshore from the launch site. Last year's failure caused SpaceX to implement several changes to the rocket and overhaul much of the Falcon 1's countdown operations. Engineers increased the number of system aborts by a factor of 30, according to Musk. SpaceX also added upgrades to the Merlin main engine to make the powerplant more robust, and new software was developed to conduct health checks of the Merlin after engine ignition before the seven-story tall launcher is released by hold-down clamps, Musk said. The return-to-flight launch was postponed from January due to an issue with the second stage engine's thrust vector control pitch actuator, which pivots the engine's nozzle to guide the rocket toward space. The problem, coupled with the unavailability of the Kwajalein Army Range due to another missile test, pushed the launch to this month. |
|
|
|
Apollo Collage This beautiful one piece set features the Apollo program emblem surrounded by the individual mission logos.Current Shuttle Mission Patch Free shipping to U.S. addresses! The official embroidered patch for shuttle Endeavour's flight to launch the Tranquility module and cupola to the space station now available in our store!![]() Hubble Patch The official embroidered patch for mission STS-125, the space shuttle's last planned service call to the Hubble Space Telescope, is available for purchase.Project Orion The Orion crew exploration vehicle is NASA's first new human spacecraft developed since the space shuttle a quarter-century earlier. The capsule is one of the key elements of returning astronauts to the Moon.Fallen Heroes Patch Collection The official patches from Apollo 1, the shuttle Challenger and Columbia crews are available in the store. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
INDEX | PLUS | NEWS ARCHIVE | LAUNCH SCHEDULE ASTRONOMY NOW | STORE ADVERTISE © 2010 Spaceflight Now Inc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||